Re: ideas of "appropriate technology" still respected?

Ian Hodur (mailto:ilh1@AXE.HUMBOLDT.EDU)
Fri, 4 Oct 1996 14:39:00 -0700

Message-ID:  <Pine.PMDF.3.91.961004143803.1101A-100000@axe.humboldt.edu>
Date:         Fri, 4 Oct 1996 14:39:00 -0700
From: Ian Hodur <mailto:ilh1@AXE.HUMBOLDT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: ideas of "appropriate technology" still respected?
To: Multiple recipients of list DEVEL-L <mailto:DEVEL-L@AMERICAN.EDU>

On Thu, 3 Oct 1996, J.C. Wandemberg wrote:
> It is beyond me how can anybody, at the dawn of the 21st century give
> technology a 'mind' of its own so as to categorized it as "bad" or "good".
>
> Technology, just like any THING is NEITHER good NOR bad in and of itself.
> It is the use we HUMANS make of it (or HOW we create it) which can be
> catergorized as either.
>

--So then the black plauge was good? It has no mind but i wouldn't say that in was 'NIETHER good NOR bad'.

> Cheers!
>
> ************************************************************
> |J.C. Wandemberg |
> |Ph.D Graduate Researcher |
> | |
> | |
> |INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR NATURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL |
> |& CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IIRM) |
> |College of Agriculture & Home Economics (NMSU) |
> |Box 30003, Dept. 3169, Las Cruces, NM 88003-003 USA |
> |URL:http://www.nmsu.edu/~iirm E-Mail:mailto:juwandem@nmsu.edu |
> **********************************************************
>
>