Farmer-to-Farmer US/Brazil program

Companheiros das Americas (mailto:poa-bsb@CR-DF.RNP.BR)
Fri, 5 May 1995 07:36:17 EST

Message-ID:  <9505051036.AA20731@cr-df.rnp.br>
Date:         Fri, 5 May 1995 07:36:17 EST
From: Companheiros das Americas <mailto:poa-bsb@CR-DF.RNP.BR>
Subject:      Farmer-to-Farmer US/Brazil program
To: Multiple recipients of list DEVEL-L

Dear friends:

During two days (April 24 and 25), around 40 people (half Americans,

half Brazilians) met (in a hotel in Ipanema, Rio) to discuss about the

introduction of the Farmer-to-Farmer program in Brazil.

As you know, the F-t-F is a Partners' program, funded by the American

Congress, to help Latin America (and Caribbean) to increase the level

of local agriculture's quality and quantity. And - no doubt - this is fine.

The program began some years ago, including an increasing number

of partnerships. Now "they" decided that is the turn of Brazil to join.

Fine. I think Brazil is the tenth Latin-American-and-Caribbean country

to join, and, in this meeting, we had maybe (I am not sure) 12 or 14

Brazilian committees, represented each by one person or two people.

Each Brazilian state committee was along with the representative

(just one) invited from the respective American partner section.

In this meeting, we Brazilians (and some Americans, as soon

you will understand) were introduced to the program fundamentals

and methodology. The explanations were conduced by Anabella Bruch -

the young agronomist fairy director of the Program, and by a special

guest-consultant, Dewey, with a lot of practice from a successful

F-t-F project (on bees), developed there are some years by the

Delaware-Panama partnership. Besides the explanations and reports,

we were often invited to improve the design of the project each

partnership was inclined to actually develop. And so they did, and

many projects - till them mere ideas - gained a format very well

conceived, able to make easier to reach our goals.

A detail. The program's main feature is to bring North-American

experts to L.-A. and C., to help with any important aspect perceived

as critical for the local project's accomplishment. This expert

(identified by the North committee) could be a real farmer or a

scholar or maybe a 4-H retired leader, or even a skillful academic

trainee, would come to spend two or three weeks helping objectively

to fulfill a demanding from the local project. These experts always

come on a volunteer basis - the program just pays the travel basic

expenses. The host committee, the local farmers, organizations,

cooperatives and universities provide local resources to the volunteer's

work. The defined goals must be fulfilled.

I was in trouble, because I had not a partner for myself (from our

American section D.C.), and so I had nobody to objectively discuss

with about our common project - the section of Brasilia (capital of

Brazil) is developing a program of community gardens including

income generation and civic-environmental education. The American

partner invited and confirmed to come, didn't for unforeseen and

serious reasons. So, I was there just as an observer, paying my

own travel Brasilia-Rio-Brasilia (by bus) and hosted at my parents

house, near Ipanema (in Copacabana).

I am convinced that the Program is and will be even more important

as it links the two greatest agricultural areas of the Americas - among

the greatest even in a worldwide scene! And I want to declare:

I enjoyed it and learned a lot there (as usual, with you Americans).

But (always a but...) I would like to make some comments, with my

best intentions, just to empower - I hope - our common work and

to bring closer our objectives:

1. As the program just previews visits from the North to the South,

and always to bring American knowledge and experience to help

us, we may wonder if our problems are due to the lack of knowledge

and/or experience about our agricultural issues. You may believe me,

they aren't. Maybe this is true in other smaller or poorer L.-A. and C

countries, but here we have a lot of agronomists, scientists,

biologists, extensionists, researchers and agronomic colleges and

schools. What is missing is a political change in the way the Govern

deals with the rural problems. The way the commercial-urban culture

sees the rural producers and the way the economic system pays for

theirs products. Who knows a Land Reform is the main Brazilian

problem, since the colonization, when a Portuguese king divided all

the huge Brazilian territory in 24 huge farms and gave to 24 friends

of him to explore our country with their slaves? Of course we need

your experience and knowledge, but imagine for a while if you

would not profit too by inviting Brazilian researchers and

extensionists to visit your farmers and help them with their problems.

2. If an American expert comes to Brazil and spend three weeks

visiting many farms, agriculture colleges, cooperatives, discussing

about our problems, seeing our lands, our soils, our crops, our

livestock, testifying our solutions and our doubts, how much would

he learn from this? And how much will learn each Brazilian producer

who will be with this American just some hours during this travel of

his/hers?

Ok, the program will follow-up here, with close monitoring and

helping from Washington and from the local committee and other

in-site support organizations. But, of course, the Americans also

learn a lot, a kind of knowledge they know will be decisive in the near

future. Yes, I think that Brazilian Congress should pay for our

farmers and researcher go to the States to "help" you too.

3. The very different climate-soil-vegetation-population systems,

in Brazil and in the US, make more difficult the technological

transference from you to us. Perhaps we are closer culturally than

ecologically. (have you ever thought that?)

4. What kind of technology would be transferred? More American

chemicals? I read (few hours ago) that, because of the stabilization

of the economy, our consumption of agrotoxical products increased

47% over the same month last year's consume. This mean that the

pollution over our country's soil will also increase 47% and the food

sold to the population 47% more poisoned. The newspaper stated

this number as an auspicious information.

To keep closer to the facts, in this meeting, an American expert

and his Brazilian partners (Virginia-Santa Catarina) defined as their

project's goal to put down the incidence of mastitis (an inflammation

in the cows' udder) in a region of small farmers in Santa Catarina.

I didn't ask, but I could have argued: what kind of medicine would

he suggest to heal these cows? Some chemical? More commercial

shopping? What about to heal the cows with a more natural

nourishment and healthier way of life?

Last Monday, the biggest Brazilian newspaper (Folha de Sao Paulo),

in its rural section, published an article (whole first-page) about an

agronomist from Brasilia, Joe Valle (I know him) very well succeeded

with his 25 cows raised just with natural feeding and herbal medicine.

To heal mastite (seldom he needs, because the cows are very healthy in

their pastures without herbicides) he uses belladonna pills. Joe calls

"green" the milk he sells, and of course he gets a better price for its

quality. The only conventional drugs he uses are the vaccines against

brucelosis, aphthoid fever and tuberculosis (he is legally constrained to).

I will stop here, although I had a lot more of things to analyze with you.

I hope we will have an opportunity to do this at live, here or there. Maybe

with the next Fellows group. Good morning, Bill. Have a nice day, BB.

Soon I will report the lunch I had today, with three officers from the

American Embassy and Jose Ivan, my friend who is trying to settle

the first social bank in Brasilia - maybe in Brazil, and about what

I have found in Internet about this matter. Thanks, Sorry, and Bye.